The semantic foundations of the frame & semantic model of the borrowing theory serve a prototype of a comprehensive analytical model relevant not only in Linguistics, yet in other humanities (Literature, Psychology, Sociology). The comprehensive phenomenon of component transgression within the meaning hierarchy is viewed from different angles: metaphoric and metonymic explication, and from the stance of conceptual integration of mental spaces and grammatical constructions of implicit meaning generation.

There is a role revealed, which belongs to the cognitive-perceptual aspect in the respective knowledge field. Critical analysis and comparison are applied to some alternative approaches in linguistic studies of transdisciplinary terminologization. The authors analyze major features of complex multidisciplinary analysis models of the recipient’s perceptual capacity related to desobjectifying contextually determined transdisciplinary borrowing of newly emerging components within a semantic hierarchy. In this example, the construction that connects various mental structures sharing a Frame-to-frame relation relation is the only element that is organic in its nature and does not create a 'semantic well', while other intensifiers of non-usual meaning are represented by complex formations combining the true reality (temporal features of the frame) with the reflexive reality (structural complexity or simplicity of the mental construct). This development of the meaning determines the potential for the expansion of the associative arrow with clarifying components, and for the introduction of different frames and their relationships within the general cognitive space: Frame-to-frame relations include composition, by which a complex frame is shown to be decomposable as a temporal structureoften a structured procedural sequence of simpler framesand inheritance. In this sense, the borrowed term no longer stands as a representation of a closed system, yet it assumes its constant dynamic unfilding within the context of a changing discursive practice, i.e., this happens via the introduction of the element 'chronotopicity' into the nuclear domain, which is typical of most cognitive and discursive terms.

Lakoff and johnson